TT:trainPart

From railML 2 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


trainPart
 


Scheme description / Schemenbeschreibung / Description du schéma

Position of trainPart in the XML-Tree / Position von trainPart im XML-Baum / position de trainPart dans l’aborescence XML

Multiplicity / Anzahl / Multiplicité

[1..∞]

Semantics / Bedeutung / Sémantique

The Element <trainPart> describes the most basic part of a train. Hence there is no changement of the formation or operating period allowed during a train parts route.

Das Element <trainPart> beschreibt die kleinste Einheit eines Zuges. Innerhalb des Laufweges eines trainPart sind daher keinerlei Wechsel der Zugkonfiguration oder der Verkehrsperiode möglich.


Attributes of trainPart / Attribute von trainPart / Attributs de trainPart

  • id: XML-file-wide unique, machine-interpretable identity, required for later referencing that element internally. For a detailed explanation see Dev:identities.
    XML-Datei-weit eindeutige, maschineninterpretierbare Identität, die für die spätere interne Referenzierung dieses Elements erforderlich ist. Für eine detaillierte Erklärung siehe Dev:identities.
  • code (introduced with version 2.1): Machine-interpretable string (e.g. an abbreviation) used for identification of the object across exchange partners, usecase specific uniqueness constraints may apply. Please see our description of the differences between id, code and human-readable identifiers.
    Maschineninterpretierbare Zeichenkette (z.B. Abkürzung), die zur Identifizierung des Objekts auch bei Austauschpartnern verwendet wird, wobei spezifische Eindeutigkeitsbeschränkungen gelten können. Bitte beachten Sie unsere Erläuterung zu den Unterschieden zwischen id, code and menschenlesbaren Kennzeichnungen.
  • name: Established, human-readable short string, giving the object a name. Not intended for machine interpretation, please see our notice on human interpretable data fields.
    Etablierte, menschenlesbare kurze Zeichenkette, die das Objekt benennt. Nicht zur maschinellen Interpretation bestimmt, siehe Hinweise zu menschenlesbaren Datenfeldern.
  • description: Human-readable, more detailed description as addition to the name. It should give additional explanations or hints to the contents of this element. Not intended for machine interpretation, please see our notice on human interpretable data fields.
    Menschenlesbare, detailliertere Beschreibung als Ergänzung zu name. Sie soll zusätzliche Erläuterungen oder Hinweise auf den Inhalt dieses Elements geben. Nicht zur maschinellen Interpretation bestimmt, siehe Hinweise zu menschenlesbaren Datenfeldern.
  • xml:lang (introduced with version 2.1): This is a unique identifier of language. It uses basically the language standard IETF BCP 47 (external link) which may be different to ISO 639-1 (external link) or ISO 639-2 (external link). For mapping hints see relation to other standards (external link).
    This defines the language used for name and description. Use <additionalName> to provide a name and/or description in other languages.
  • line: This is the code or number of the train service that this train part belongs to.
    Linienbezeichnung des Zuges, zu dem dieser Zugteil gehört.
  • trainLine (deprecated with version 2.1): Use line instead.
  • trainNumber: This attribute may contain the number of the train part or the number of the corresponding train (as the name may suggest). There is no direct way to identify the number of the corresponding train since there may be for instance an operational and a commercial train referring to this train part. However, it is possible to follow the attribute <trainPartRef>.ref from any train to find out which one (or more) refers to the current train part.

For more information on trains an train parts, see examples below and Train Coupling And Sharing.

  • additionalTrainNumber: The precise semantics of this attribute are not fixed in the standard. The general idea for this is to allow for specifying an attribute that distinguishes between trains, that though running with the same train number, are alternative variants of a train. In general identity is very important when it comes to data transfers, in particular with updates to previous data transfers. In order to achieve a unique identity several attributes can be used, such as trainNumber, scope and <organizationalUnitBinding>. If variants still exist, using these, or if identity cannot be achieved that way (e.g. organizational unit data is not available in the participating systems), additionalTrainNumber may be used to distinguish between variants of a train part.
  • processStatus: It describes the trainPart status in relation to a working process.
Note.png The semantics of the attribute values for @processStatus have not been fully defined in the past. In general the attribute shall describe a state of the process supported by railML®. Therefore the precise semantics shall be clarified between data provider and the data consumer.
Examples:
If an updated version of a timetable is transferred, the @processStatus is used by some systems to indicate if a train was changed compared to the previous data transfer by providing @processStatus=changed.
For the use case slot ordering the attribute is used with the value planned by some systems to describe that a train has been planned in the scheduling tool, but hasn’t been taken into account for the slot ordering process.

Possible values are:

  • planned
  • actual
  • calculated
  • toBeChecked
  • changed
  • imported
  • other:anything Any value that does not fit any value from the previous enumeration list, fulfilling the constraint: at minimum two characters, whitespace is not allowed.
  • debitcode: This is a debitor code for financial considerations.
  • remarks: This is a free remark for further description.
Birne.png Please take into account our references to human-intepretable data fields.

Bitte berücksichtigen Sie unsere Hinweise zu menschen-intepretierbaren Datenfeldern.

Veuillez tenir compte de nos références aux champs de données à valeur humaine.

  • timetablePeriodRef: This refers to the id attribute of the associated <timetablePeriod> element.
  • categoryRef: This refers to the id attribute of the associated <category> element.
  • operator (deprecated with version 2.3): This is the train operator. It is recommended to use <organizationalUnitBinding> instead of operator.
  • cancellation (introduced with version 2.3): Indicates, that this trainPart is no longer valid and should be canceled out of a previously delivered set (i. e. out of a previously railML® file).
  • onRequest (introduced with version 2.5): indicates, that this trainPart is considered on request if this flag is true. This means that there is a planned train, but normally its not run.

Syntactic Constraints / Syntaktische Beschränkungen / Contraintes syntactiques

  • id: xs:ID, required
    a string, starting with a letter (a..zA..Z) or an underscore (_),
    followed by a non-colonized and non-spaced string consisting of letters, digits, points (.), dashes (-) or underscores (_)
Birne.png Please take into account our references to human-intepretable data fields.

Bitte berücksichtigen Sie unsere Hinweise zu menschen-intepretierbaren Datenfeldern.

Veuillez tenir compte de nos références aux champs de données à valeur humaine.

Best practice & Examples / Empfohlene Anwendung & Beispiele / Bonnes pratiques & exemples

Usage of @trainNumber

The same <trainPart> could be referenced by several operational and commercial trains. Therefore the trainNumber within a trainPart is in the best case redundant, if it is used as a shortcut to the commercial train number. The recommended practice is to use trainNumber only on train level.

Example

Part of the City Night Line 242:

 <rail:trainPart id="CNL_242_2" trainNumber="242" processStatus="actual" 
  description="CNL 242" timetablePeriodRef="J08" categoryRef="cCNL">
  <rail:ocpsTT>
  ...
  </rail:ocpsTT>
 </rail:trainPart>


Usage of @onRequest

Demand trains are trains that are already planned in the timetable planning. This means that routes with corresponding travel times through the network are already planned, but with these trains it is clear from the outset that they will only be used after intervention by the scheduler. In fact, the importance of such on-demand trains is gradually diminishing as the systems involved improve, since planning a new train is always associated with less effort. Nevertheless, many railroad companies still work with this concept.

Up to and including version 2.4 of railML®, it was not possible to represent demand trains in a standardized way. Often attempts were made to circumvent this shortcoming by means of a special train category, but this procedure always requires that at least the name of this special category is exchanged between the producer and the consumer. Another common solution was to use custom extensions of the standard, but this also required detailed coordination between producer and consumer. With railML®2.5 it is now possible to mark a train as a demand train.

In order to mark demand trains as such in railML®2.5, the definition of the element <trainPart> has been extended by the Boolean attribute @onRequest. Thus, in the case of a pure demand train, all trainParts of a <train> would be marked with @onRequest = "true". Of course it is also possible to mark only parts of a train as "on demand", for example to let a train exceed the planned destination in case of high passenger volume or to let it start earlier.

Bedarfszüge sind Züge, die im Rahmen der Fahrplanplanung bereits geplant werden. Es werden also bereits Fahrwege mit entsprechenden Fahrzeiten durch das Netz geplant, allerdings ist bei diesen Zügen von vornherein klar, dass diese nur nach Eingriff des Disponenten eingesetzt werden. Tatsächlich schwindet die Bedeutung solcher Bedarfszüge mit zunehmender Verbesserung der beteiligten Systeme nach und nach, da das Planen eines neuen Zuges stetig mit geringerem Aufwand verbunden ist. Nichtsdestotrotz arbeiten viele EVU nach wie vor mit diesem Konzept.

Bis einschließlich Version 2.4 von railML® war es nicht möglich Bedarfszüge standardisiert abzubilden. Oft wurde mittels einer besonderen Zugskategorie versucht diesen Mangel zu umgehen, allerdings erfordert dieses Vorgehen immer, dass zwischen Produzent und Konsument zumindest der Name dieser Spezialkategorie ausgetauscht wird. Eine andere verbreitete Lösung war die Nutzung von Custom-Erweiterungen des Standards, die aber ebenfalls eine detaillierte Abstimmung zwischen Produzenten und Konsumenten erforderte. Mit railML 2.5 ist es nun möglich einen Zug als Bedarfszug zu markieren.

Um Bedarfszüge in railML®2.5 als solche zu markieren wurde die Definition des Elements <trainPart> um das boolesche Attribut @onRequest erweitert. Bei einem reinen Bedarfszug würden also alle trainParts eines <train> mit @onRequest = „true“ markiert werden. Über diese Modellierung ist es natürlich auch möglich nur Teile von Fahrten als „Bei Bedarf“ zu kennzeichnen, etwa um einen Zug im Falle hohen Fahrgastaufkommens über das geplante Ziel hinaus fahren bzw. früher einsetzen zu lassen.

Notes / Anmerkungen / Notes

There are several ways to describe an empty run (inside a station) or depot run. If it is planned in all details in the timetable, it is treated as a train and will be defined with appropriate <ocpTT>'s in the trainPart, possibly with <serviceSectionRef>'s if known. If it is loosely planned with time constants but not infrastructural references, it is not treated as a train run and will be defined as <blockPart> with an appropriate mission value.

To find out whether a train part is passenger or freight hauling, see Train types, categories, products, and passenger usage.

Open issues / Offene Punkte/Pedenzen / Questions ouvertes

Not yet described. / Noch nicht beschrieben. / Pas encore décrit.