Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- dependency is essential for the use case or considered optional. Please describe what data is exchanged for the use case. What is part and what is not part10 bytes (263 words) - 21:42, 23 January 2020
- Dev:Use cases (section What is a use case?)edit an older use case, please stick to the following structure. To get an impression how to employ the templates of this list see Dev:Use case example/old10 bytes (1,035 words) - 21:45, 23 January 2020
- Dev:Use case example/old (category Use case (unknown subschema)) (section Use case / Anwendungsfall)good use case. For an actual example see UC:IS:Schematic Track Plan. To get more information on use cases and how to describe them, see Dev:Use cases. Please10 bytes (220 words) - 16:47, 4 December 2023
- and Developer Pages This page provides an overview over pages from the Dev-namespace that offer User Guides, information for developers and connected8 KB (25 words) - 18:35, 5 February 2024
- Dev:Guides/auto (category Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function)Sharing Dev:Types of ocps Dev:UML Dev:Units Dev:Usage of the track between the stations Dev:Use case example/old Dev:Use cases Dev:UsingAny Dev:Wiki Documentation202 bytes (229 words) - 18:26, 23 November 2020
- with us. To learn where to find, how to use and how to contribute use cases see Dev:Use cases. While use cases follow a top-down approach, starting out10 bytes (674 words) - 21:20, 23 January 2020
- The railML® wiki offers a number of Use Cases. A Guideline to implementing Use Cases can be found under Dev:Use cases. In contrast to railML® 2, railML®10 bytes (1,478 words) - 18:13, 5 March 2021
- personResponsible must occur once. (line 17) In case the element contract is used the elements number and requirement have to be used, too. The element requirement may10 bytes (2,659 words) - 17:25, 30 May 2022
- references across files and data sources. In case of valid railML® files, no problems will occur. In case of consuming "good or bad styled" id values the7 KB (807 words) - 19:07, 22 January 2024
- semantic constraint on the respective list below (Dev:Semantic_Constraints/table2 for railML® 2 and Dev:Semantic_Constraints/table3 for railML® 3). assign10 bytes (579 words) - 15:58, 18 May 2020
- (character sub-set) follows implicitly from the characters used in the name. So, the only case when to use the script sub-tag is to distinguish between two <additionalName>10 KB (1,656 words) - 19:14, 22 January 2024
- all information that is collected about the ÖBB in the code list, in this case name, country code and company code: <infrastructureManager code="ÖBB"> <name>ÖBB10 bytes (797 words) - 12:25, 24 January 2020
- infrastructure elements are aggregated to an <ocp> depends on the context (use case) and the accuracy requirement of the timetable. Timetables that aim more18 KB (2,618 words) - 16:53, 19 March 2024
- trainPart is in the best case redundant, if it is used as a shortcut to the commercial train number. The recommended practice is to use trainNumber only on9 KB (1,629 words) - 21:03, 22 January 2024
- Infrastructure Rollingstock Timetable (Common) (Codelists) XML tree UML diagrams Use cases Versions & Changes1 KB (51 words) - 17:17, 15 April 2024
- Article: Dev:Versions The development of the early alpha versions started in 2001. Version 1.0, the first version allotted for productive use, was published10 bytes (403 words) - 16:31, 18 May 2020
- single-track railway lines with regular traffic in both directions. In that case, please use value "none" in order to mark that there is no preferred driving direction9 KB (1,420 words) - 10:23, 1 February 2024
- values of the connected <trackBegin> and <trackEnd> must be identical just in case both are provided and no mileageChange at this point is defined and both4 KB (545 words) - 18:10, 22 March 2024
- most useful when shipping the railML® document as a zip archive. In this case the image resource can be provided along with the actual document. If the4 KB (918 words) - 15:35, 14 September 2023
- values can be given per vehicle. In case of vehicles with interchangeable track gauge the value for the gauge mainly used shall be given. Additional information10 KB (1,797 words) - 13:09, 24 January 2022