Talk:TT:trainPart: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Discussion moved from wiki page) |
Dirk Bräuer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==== Example 2: Meaning of train parts and usage of trainNumber, code, sequence, position, and name ==== | ==== Example 2: Meaning of train parts and usage of trainNumber, code, sequence, position, and name ==== | ||
[[Benutzer:Philip Wobst|Philip Wobst]] 08:55, 16. Dez. 2014 (CET): I find it very helpful that a good use case is provided as an example and appreciate the documentation. However, the code element was added and it has the same value as the trainNumber but no explanation/description is given why it was added for this example. A similar example is given for the [[TT:Train_Coupling_And_Sharing|Train coupling and sharing]] - maybe it would make sense to reference the example there instead. | [[Benutzer:Philip Wobst|Philip Wobst]] 08:55, 16. Dez. 2014 (CET): I find it very helpful that a good use case is provided as an example and appreciate the documentation. However, the code element was added and it has the same value as the trainNumber but no explanation/description is given why it was added for this example. A similar example is given for the [[TT:Train_Coupling_And_Sharing|Train coupling and sharing]] - maybe it would make sense to reference the example there instead. | ||
As far as I know, the attribute "code" was introduced in general and only by inheritance here. There is no specific background in connection with "trainNumber". So please do not overestimate the attribute "code" here. | |||
Revision as of 17:01, 16 December 2014
Example 2: Meaning of train parts and usage of trainNumber, code, sequence, position, and name
Philip Wobst 08:55, 16. Dez. 2014 (CET): I find it very helpful that a good use case is provided as an example and appreciate the documentation. However, the code element was added and it has the same value as the trainNumber but no explanation/description is given why it was added for this example. A similar example is given for the Train coupling and sharing - maybe it would make sense to reference the example there instead.
As far as I know, the attribute "code" was introduced in general and only by inheritance here. There is no specific background in connection with "trainNumber". So please do not overestimate the attribute "code" here.