Dev:Border between infrastructure managers and countries: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
m (added tag) |
(wording) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The photo shows an example of a ‘handover point’ between Germany and Austria, IMs {{wikipedia|1=DB InfraGO|3=de}} in Germany and {{wikipedia|ÖBB Infra}} in Austria. Here also two railway lines meet each other - "Bahnstrecke München Ost Pbf – Simbach (Inn) (DB-Grenze)" and "Bahnstrecke Neumarkt-Kallham – Staatsgrenze nächst Braunau am Inn". | The photo shows an example of a ‘handover point’ between Germany and Austria, IMs {{wikipedia|1=DB InfraGO|3=de}} in Germany and {{wikipedia|ÖBB Infra}} in Austria. Here also two railway lines meet each other - "Bahnstrecke München Ost Pbf – Simbach (Inn) (DB-Grenze)" and "Bahnstrecke Neumarkt-Kallham – Staatsgrenze nächst Braunau am Inn". | ||
In the source code, shown below, there are two tracks. When choosing approach with two tracks be aware of semantic constraints e.g. IS:003 "If two {{tag|IS|track}}s are connected, the @absPos values of the connected {{tag|IS|trackBegin}} and {{tag|IS|trackEnd}} must be identical" <ref name="semCon">[[Dev:Semantic_Constraints]]</ref>. Here exception to restriction IS:003<ref name="semCon"></ref> applies because tracks belong to different mileage systems. | In the source code, shown below, there are two tracks. When choosing approach with two tracks be aware of semantic constraints e.g. IS:003 "If two {{tag|IS|track}}s are connected, the @absPos values of the connected {{tag|IS|trackBegin}} and {{tag|IS|trackEnd}} must be identical" <ref name="semCon">[[Dev:Semantic_Constraints]]</ref>. Here exception to restriction IS:003<ref name="semCon"></ref> applies because tracks belong to different mileage systems. In code this justification is represented via two railway lines referring to tracks. | ||
Ownership is represented by @infrastructureManagerRef of {{tag|IS|line}} elements. Further information about IMs is given in the {{tag|CO|infrastructureManager}} element and corresponding {{site|1=https://wiki2.railml.org/wiki/Dev:InfrastructureManagers|2=code list}}. | Ownership is represented by @infrastructureManagerRef of {{tag|IS|line}} elements. Further information about IMs is given in the {{tag|CO|infrastructureManager}} element and corresponding {{site|1=https://wiki2.railml.org/wiki/Dev:InfrastructureManagers|2=code list}}. | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
The photo shows an example of a ‘handover point’ at the Germany-Czech Republic border on {{wikipedia|Děčín–Dresden-Neustadt_railway}}. This line is operated by two different rail operating companies, {{wikipedia|Správa_železnic}} in the Czech Republic and {{wikipedia|1=DB InfraGO|3=de}} in Germany, meaning there is a change in infrastructure managers. Mileage of the border was obtained from Variabler Infrastruktur Aggregator<ref>{{external|1=https://via.bahnkonzept.de/index.php?srs=6240&dbi=1101&fti=11110000&vsi=010|2=Variabler Infrastruktur Aggregator|mode=silent}}</ref>. | The photo shows an example of a ‘handover point’ at the Germany-Czech Republic border on {{wikipedia|Děčín–Dresden-Neustadt_railway}}. This line is operated by two different rail operating companies, {{wikipedia|Správa_železnic}} in the Czech Republic and {{wikipedia|1=DB InfraGO|3=de}} in Germany, meaning there is a change in infrastructure managers. Mileage of the border was obtained from Variabler Infrastruktur Aggregator<ref>{{external|1=https://via.bahnkonzept.de/index.php?srs=6240&dbi=1101&fti=11110000&vsi=010|2=Variabler Infrastruktur Aggregator|mode=silent}}</ref>. | ||
In the source code, shown below, there is one track. Ownership is represented by {{tag|IS|ownerChange}} elements. Further information about IMs is given in the {{tag|CO|infrastructureManager}} element and corresponding {{site|1=https://wiki2.railml.org/wiki/Dev:InfrastructureManagers|2=code list}}. | |||
[[File:2023-11-29 railML handoverPoint.jpg|thumb|Border between infrastructure managers {{wikipedia|Správa_železnic}} in the Czech Republic and {{wikipedia|1=DB InfraGO|3=de}} in Germany ({{external|https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Falk2|By Falk2|mode=silent}}/{{external|https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:J35_445_Bf_Schöna,_Einfvsig_V1,_V3.jpg|Image source|mode=silent}}/{{external|https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode|CC BY-SA 3.0|mode=silent}})]] | [[File:2023-11-29 railML handoverPoint.jpg|thumb|Border between infrastructure managers {{wikipedia|Správa_železnic}} in the Czech Republic and {{wikipedia|1=DB InfraGO|3=de}} in Germany ({{external|https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Falk2|By Falk2|mode=silent}}/{{external|https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:J35_445_Bf_Schöna,_Einfvsig_V1,_V3.jpg|Image source|mode=silent}}/{{external|https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode|CC BY-SA 3.0|mode=silent}})]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:57, 26 April 2024
Introduction
Border between infrastructure managers (handover point) is the point where legal responsibility changes between the infrastructure managers (IM) [TAF TAP TSI][1].
These IM borders can be found between countries and within one e.g. in case there are private and national railway infrastructure managers in a country. Sometimes there two railway lines meet each other. Therefore below you can see two examples:
- border between lines and border between IMs coincide;
- border between IMs is within one line.
Borders between IMs and railway lines coincide
The photo shows an example of a ‘handover point’ between Germany and Austria, IMs DB InfraGO (
🇩🇪) in Germany and ÖBB Infra () in Austria. Here also two railway lines meet each other - "Bahnstrecke München Ost Pbf – Simbach (Inn) (DB-Grenze)" and "Bahnstrecke Neumarkt-Kallham – Staatsgrenze nächst Braunau am Inn".
In the source code, shown below, there are two tracks. When choosing approach with two tracks be aware of semantic constraints e.g. IS:003 "If two <track>s are connected, the @absPos values of the connected <trackBegin> and <trackEnd> must be identical" [2]. Here exception to restriction IS:003[2] applies because tracks belong to different mileage systems. In code this justification is represented via two railway lines referring to tracks.
Ownership is represented by @infrastructureManagerRef of <line> elements. Further information about IMs is given in the <infrastructureManager> element and corresponding code list (link to the railML® website).
) in Austria and DB InfraGO ( 🇩🇪) in Germany (By Renardo la vulpo/Image source/CC0)
<metadata>
<organizationalUnits>
<infrastructureManager id="ima01" code="DBN"/>
<infrastructureManager id="ima02" code="ÖBB"/>
</organizationalUnits>
</metadata>
..
<track id="tr01">
<trackTopology>
<trackBegin id="tb01" pos="0" absPos="0">..</trackBegin>
<trackEnd id="te01" pos="115087" absPos="115087">..</trackEnd>
</trackTopology>
<trackElements>
..
</track>
<track id="tr02">
<trackTopology>
<trackBegin id="tb02" pos="0" absPos="59229">..</trackBegin>
<trackEnd id="te02" pos="59220" absPos="9">..</trackEnd>
</trackTopology>
..
</track>
<trackGroups>
<line id="lin01" code="5600" infrastructureManagerRef="ima01" name="Bahnstrecke München Ost Pbf – Simbach (Inn) (DB-Grenze)">
<trackRef ref="tr01"/>
</line>
<line id="lin02" code="20701" infrastructureManagerRef="ima02" name="Bahnstrecke Neumarkt-Kallham – Staatsgrenze nächst Braunau am Inn">
<trackRef ref="tr02"/>
</line>
</trackGroups>
Border between IMs is within one railway line
The photo shows an example of a ‘handover point’ at the Germany-Czech Republic border on Děčín–Dresden-Neustadt_railway (). This line is operated by two different rail operating companies, Správa_železnic () in the Czech Republic and DB InfraGO ( 🇩🇪) in Germany, meaning there is a change in infrastructure managers. Mileage of the border was obtained from Variabler Infrastruktur Aggregator[3].
In the source code, shown below, there is one track. Ownership is represented by <ownerChange> elements. Further information about IMs is given in the <infrastructureManager> element and corresponding code list (link to the railML® website).
) in the Czech Republic and DB InfraGO ( 🇩🇪) in Germany (By Falk2/Image source/CC BY-SA 3.0)
<metadata>
<organizationalUnits>
<infrastructureManager id="ima01" code="DBN"/>
<infrastructureManager id="ima02" code="SZD"/>
</organizationalUnits>
</metadata>
..
<track id="tr01">
<trackTopology>
<trackBegin id="tb01" pos="0" absPos="0">..</trackBegin>
<trackEnd id="te01" pos="65986" absPos="65986">..</trackEnd>
</trackTopology>
<trackElements>
..
<ownerChange id="och01" pos="0" absPos="0" infrastructureManagerRef="ima01"/>
<ownerChange id="och02" pos="11859" absPos="11859" infrastructureManagerRef="ima02" name="Bahnverw.grenze Bad Schandau Gr"/>
..
</trackElements>
</track>