UC:TT:PassengerInformationAtStations: Difference between revisions

From railML 2 Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[unchecked revision][checked revision]
No edit summary
(Änderung 4372 von Christian Rößiger (Diskussion) rückgängig gemacht.)
Line 319: Line 319:


Reminder: geocoordinaten am ocp sollten u.U. auch den Kodierungsstandard enthalten (WGS84, CHxxx).
Reminder: geocoordinaten am ocp sollten u.U. auch den Kodierungsstandard enthalten (WGS84, CHxxx).
== Review Comments ==
# Werden commercial oder operational <trains> übertragen oder beides?
# Wird nur ein Betriebstag übertragen oder eine ganze (Fahrplan-) Periode? Wenn nur ein Betriebstag, wie wird mit Zügen umgegangen, die über Mitternacht verkehren?
# Enthält die Infrastruktur nur die Knoten (<ocp>s) des Netzes oder auch Kanten (<line>s bzw. <track>s)?
# Sind die in railML2.3 neu eingeführten Attribute für Cancellation of trains/trainParts in diesem Usecase relevant?
# Zur Bemerkung "Übergangstyp in <rostering>" am Ende des Usecases: Was für Übergangstypen sind da gemeint, "Kopfmachen" vs. "Durchbindung ohne Kopfmachen" oder etwas anderes?

Revision as of 11:33, 20 January 2016

Use case / Anwendungsfall / :

Passenger information at stations / Fahrgastinformation am Bahnhof


Description / Beschreibung /

This use case describes the exchange of data between a system for providing passenger information at a railway station and a timetable planning system. The PIS allows for display of the current schedule including information about the current state of operation such as delays, cancelation or additional trains. In order to do so the schedule as published to the passenger for the current day of operation is necessary. The completeness of this timetable information limits the accuracy of the information available to the passenger by means of the PIS. The mandatory data can be limited to the services run on the current operation day, including all stops of a train with the according arrival and departure times. Additional information for can be provided to model blocks of services (can be used to increase accuracy of forecast information), planned interconnection with other services, planned construction sites with impact on the services, etc.


Data Flows and Interfaces / Datenflüsse und Schnittstellen /

A PIS is a pure railML consumer.

Mandatory information imported from timetable system includes:

  • <train>
  • <trainPart>
  • <category>
  • <ocp>

Optionally imported information includes:

  • <track>
  • <formation>
  • <annotation>/<annotationRef>
  • <rostering>
  • <connection> (in order to provide and manage connection information for internal or external services)
  • <statistics>

If the topology is not imported from railML it is assumed that it is imported from a different source including an appropriate mapping to the ocp’s imported from railML.


Interference with other railML® schemas / Interferenz mit anderen railML®-Schemen /

  • Mandatory: infrastructure
  • Optionally: rolling stock


Characterizing Data / Charakterisierung der Daten /

This section serves to specify the required data regarding certain aspects.

How often do the data change (update)?

  • yearly
  • regular changes
  • daily

How big are the data fragments to be exchanged (complexity)?

  • Huge - whole data set

Which views are represented by the data (focus)?

  • Mid term planning (eg. for yearly timetable disposition)
  • Short term planning (eg. for trackworks)
  • Passenger information

Which specific timetable data do you expect to receive/send (elements)?

Element

Mandatory

Remarks

Infrastructure/operationControlPoints/ocp

X

Used for referencing with the PIS topology

<timetable>/<timetablePeriods>/<timetablePeriod>

X


<timetable>/<operatingPeriods>/<operatingPeriod>

X


<timetable>/<categories>/<category>



<timetable>/<annotations>/<annotation>



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/formationTT



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/operatingPeriodRef

X


<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT

X


<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT/times

X


<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT/connections



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT/connections/connection



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT/connections/connection/annotationRef



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT/statistics



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT/sectionTT/runTimes



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT/stopDescription



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT/stopDescription/stopTimes



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/ocpsTT/stopDescription/annotationRef



<timetable>/<trainParts>/<trainPart>/annotationRef



<timetable>/trains/train

X


<timetable>/trains/train/trainPartSequence

X


<timetable>/trains/train/trainPartSequence/trainPartRef

X


<timetable>/rosterings/rostering/blockParts/blockPart



<timetable>/rosterings/rostering/blocks/block



<timetable>/rosterings/rostering/blocks/block/blockPartSequence/blockPartRef




Mit Blick auf den Usecase Fahrgastinformation im Fahrzeug sollte <annotation> u. U. erweitert werden, um das Zielsystem der Sonderinformation zu bestimmen. Ausserdem sollte m. E. nach im rostering der Übergangstyp hinterlegt werden. Das hat Einfluss auf die Prognoseberechnung, sowie die berechnung von Via Zieltexten.

Reminder: geocoordinaten am ocp sollten u.U. auch den Kodierungsstandard enthalten (WGS84, CHxxx).