Talk:UC:IL:UseCases

From railML 2 Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Prioritization and Communication of IL uses cases

I propose to edit the use cases sorted as validated priorities That is (to be discussed and approbed before publishing): (below a trial as chart, and further below the original text version enriched

Priority Description (EN) Description (DE) Status
1 Data prepration for interlocking Datenbereitstellung für Stellwerkssysteme ongoing
2 Interlocking engineering for signalling Stellwerkstechnik für Signalisierung tbc
3 Interlocking engineering Stellwerksprojektierung tbc
4 Example Example Example
5 Example Example Example
6 Example Example Example
tbd Example Example Example
tbd Example Example Example
tbd Example Example Example
tbd Example Example Example

I propose to edit the use cases sorted as validated priorities

That is (to be discussed and approbed before publishing):

The following list provides links to the use cases related with interlocking:

--Alain Jeanmaire (talk) 12:57, 29 August 2016 (CEST)

I suggest to add a column with the reporter of the use case (EULYNX, Jernbaneverket, ...) and a column with the status of the use case (draft, discussed, consolidated, implemented, revised, ...). --Vasco Paul Kolmorgen (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2016 (CEST)
Agreed during the IL developers conference call that this table shall be extended with an abbreviation column and used from now for priorisation and status follow up. --Coordination (talk) 15:12, 6 September 2016 (CEST)
I am going to make this list. As to avoid misunderstandings, I would like to ask you for some clarifications.
  • Did I understand you properly, that this change relates to the list of use cases — or does it affect the use case articles themselves? (e.g.: should the abbreviation and the status be integrated into the individual use case articles?)
  • Which kind of prioritization will be implemented? I'll have to explain the criterion to the readers of the page ...
Thank you in advance for your answers.
I would appreciate your participation in the discussion on the documentation of railML®3, as the decisions made in this matter will affect all of us — see here (link to the railML® website).
Yours, Ferri Leberl (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2016 (CEST)