Talk:UC:IL:UseCases: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Decision of IL conference call added) |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
: I suggest to add a column with the reporter of the use case (EULYNX, Jernbaneverket, ...) and a column with the status of the use case (draft, discussed, consolidated, implemented, revised, ...). --[[User:Vasco Paul Kolmorgen|Vasco Paul Kolmorgen]] ([[User talk:Vasco Paul Kolmorgen|talk]]) 21:37, 29 August 2016 (CEST) | : I suggest to add a column with the reporter of the use case (EULYNX, Jernbaneverket, ...) and a column with the status of the use case (draft, discussed, consolidated, implemented, revised, ...). --[[User:Vasco Paul Kolmorgen|Vasco Paul Kolmorgen]] ([[User talk:Vasco Paul Kolmorgen|talk]]) 21:37, 29 August 2016 (CEST) | ||
:: Agreed during the [https://www.railml.org/en/event-reader/railml-interlocking-status-telco-2016-09-06.html IL developers conference call] that this table shall be extended with an abbreviation column and used from now for priorisation and status follow up. --[[User:Coordination|Coordination]] ([[User talk:Coordination|talk]]) 15:12, 6 September 2016 (CEST) | :: Agreed during the [https://www.railml.org/en/event-reader/railml-interlocking-status-telco-2016-09-06.html IL developers conference call] that this table shall be extended with an abbreviation column and used from now for priorisation and status follow up. --[[User:Coordination|Coordination]] ([[User talk:Coordination|talk]]) 15:12, 6 September 2016 (CEST) | ||
:::I am going to make this list. As to avoid misunderstandings, I would like to ask you for some clarifications. | |||
:::*Did I understand you properly, that this change relates to the list of use cases — or does it affect the use case articles themselves? (e.g.: should the abbreviation and the status be integrated into the individual use case articles?) | |||
:::*Which kind of prioritization will be implemented? I'll have to explain the criterion to the readers of the page ... | |||
:::Thank you in advance for your answers.<br>I would appreciate your participation in the discussion on the documentation of {{rml}}3, as the decisions made in this matter will affect all of us — see {{site|http://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=469&start=0&|here}}.<br>Yours, [[User:Ferri Leberl|Ferri Leberl]] ([[User talk:Ferri Leberl|talk]]) 17:23, 8 September 2016 (CEST) |
Revision as of 17:23, 8 September 2016
Prioritization and Communication of IL uses cases
I propose to edit the use cases sorted as validated priorities That is (to be discussed and approbed before publishing): (below a trial as chart, and further below the original text version enriched
Priority | Description (EN) | Description (DE) | Description (FR) | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Data prepration for interlocking | Datenbereitstellung für Stellwerkssysteme | [[IL:UC:EulynxDataPreparationInterlocking|]] | ongoing |
2 | Interlocking engineering for signalling | Stellwerkstechnik für Signalisierung | [[IL:UC:InterlockEngineeringForSignallingWithinJBV|]] | tbc |
3 | Interlocking engineering | Stellwerksprojektierung | [[IL:UC:InterlockingEngineering|]] | tbc |
4 | Example | Example | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example | Example | Example |
tbd | Example | Example | Example | Example |
tbd | Example | Example | Example | Example |
tbd | Example | Example | Example | Example |
tbd | Example | Example | Example | Example |
I propose to edit the use cases sorted as validated priorities
That is (to be discussed and approbed before publishing):
The following list provides links to the use cases related with interlocking:
- Data prepration for interlocking; Datenbereitstellung für Stellwerkssysteme (reported by EULYNX project)
- Interlocking engineering for signalling; Stellwerkstechnik für Signalisierung (reported by Jernbaneverket, Norway)
- Interlocking engineering; Stellwerksprojektierung;
- Simulation; Simulation
- Operation and Control; Betriebsführung
- Hardware and cable plan; Aussenanlage und Kabelplan
- Site preparation data for Signal Controlled Warning Systems (SCWS); Daten zur Standortvorbereitung für Rottenwarnsysteme
--Alain Jeanmaire (talk) 12:57, 29 August 2016 (CEST)
- I suggest to add a column with the reporter of the use case (EULYNX, Jernbaneverket, ...) and a column with the status of the use case (draft, discussed, consolidated, implemented, revised, ...). --Vasco Paul Kolmorgen (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2016 (CEST)
- Agreed during the IL developers conference call that this table shall be extended with an abbreviation column and used from now for priorisation and status follow up. --Coordination (talk) 15:12, 6 September 2016 (CEST)
- I am going to make this list. As to avoid misunderstandings, I would like to ask you for some clarifications.
- Did I understand you properly, that this change relates to the list of use cases — or does it affect the use case articles themselves? (e.g.: should the abbreviation and the status be integrated into the individual use case articles?)
- Which kind of prioritization will be implemented? I'll have to explain the criterion to the readers of the page ...
- Thank you in advance for your answers.
I would appreciate your participation in the discussion on the documentation of railML®3, as the decisions made in this matter will affect all of us — see here (link to the railML® website).
Yours, Ferri Leberl (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2016 (CEST)
- I am going to make this list. As to avoid misunderstandings, I would like to ask you for some clarifications.
- Agreed during the IL developers conference call that this table shall be extended with an abbreviation column and used from now for priorisation and status follow up. --Coordination (talk) 15:12, 6 September 2016 (CEST)