From railML 2 Wiki
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Semantic of type and mapping to national usage?

As to comply with our guidelines (the wiki discussion pages should be preserved to wiki issues), we moved the debate on principles that developed here to the forum to this place.

You can backtrace the discussion via the page history.

Thank you for your understanding.

Yours, Ferri Leberl (talk) 16:23, 6 June 2017 (CEST)

Summary of the national usage of type

This Table sumarizes the usage of type in different companies, as stated here. It is planned to transfer it to the best practice section of <track> as soon as it is completed. This place is intended for collection only, please put any remarks to the railML's discussion board.

Country MainTrack SecondaryTrack ConnectingTrack SidingTrack StationTrack
(deprecated with version 2.4)
Other:Anything Reported by

not used


not used

not used
within stations
“on path”
Germany Durchgehendes Hauptgleis nicht-durchgehendes Hauptgleis Gleisverbindung Nebengleis not used Netz
Quelle: Ril 408.0101A01
Switzerland DE: Hauptgleis
Signalisiertes Gleis
FR: Voie signalée
IT: Binario segnalato
not used not used Nebengleis
Nicht-signalisiertes Gleis
FR: Voie non-signalée
IT: Binario non segnalato
not used SBB Infra
Quelle: SBB-Vorschrift I-22211
Netherlands Hoofdspoorweg Lokaalspoorweg not used Raccordement not used ProRail
Bron: Spoorwegwet
Czechia Hlavní kolej Spojovací kolej Kolejová spojka Manipulační koleje not used SŽDC
Uvedení pramenů: Dopravní a návěstní předpis (D1)
Done it :)
Ferri Leberl (talk) 10:41, 19 January 2018 (CET)