Talk:IS:track
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Semantic of type and mapping to national usage?
There is a unclear mapping for the classifications of the track in the type attribute. The usage in Germany is currently AFAIK:
- Durchgehendes Hauptgleis; pro Betriebsstelle immer Eines bei je Eingleisiger und Zwei je zweigleisiger Strecken, mit Zugstraße
- Hauptgleis; alle anderen Gleise mit mindestens einer Zugstraße
- Nebengleis; alle anderen Gleise ohne Zugstraßen, nur Rangierfahrten
- Gleisverbindung; Gleise ohne eigenen Verkehrswert, in Weichenverbindungen, Überleitungen
The mapping for mainTrack to Deutschland: durchgehendes Hauptgleis is nearby, but whats with the others:
- secondaryTrack: This is a track not frequently used (e. g. for overtaking only).
- connectingTrack: This is a transfer track from one to another track e. g. in branches, points or cross overs.
- sidingTrack: This is a siding.
- stationTrack: This is a track in a station, possibly with plattforms.
- other:anything: Any value that does not fit any value from the previous enumeration list, fulfilling the constraint: at minimum two characters, whitespace is not allowed. Please, apply Dev:usingAny accordingly.
Any opinions for railML® 2.x and for a refactoring in railML® 3.x? --Vasco Paul Kolmorgen (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2017 (CEST)