Dev:identities: Difference between revisions

From railML 2 Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
(→‎Recommendation: Limitation in railML 2 added.)
Line 83: Line 83:


The use of this '''Wrong style''' prevents certification of the import interface.
The use of this '''Wrong style''' prevents certification of the import interface.
== Differentiation from other indications ==
Many elements that come with an attribute {{attr|id}} will also have the attributes {{attr|code}}, {{attr|name}} {{attr|description}}.
*{{attr|code}}: Like {{attr|id}} it is machine readable, but a code is designed for interoperability. An id is valid within a single file. A code can be valid e.g. within a network and has to be unique within the network.
*{{attr|name}}: A short, human readable Identifier. Uniqueness is not required.
*{{attr|description}}: Human readable text that gives details. Uniqueness is not required.
{{note|Please be aware that this attribute is only intended to forward simple remarks/explanations from one end-user to another end-user. It is not to be used to contain computer-processable data, nor shall it be parsed by programmes in any way. In case of semantical overlaps or discrepancies to machine processable file contents, any machine processable contents have priority over possible human interpretable contents. However, the attribute may be used to transmit complementary details to machine processable parameters.
{{deu|Bitte, berücksichtigen Sie, dass dieses Attribut nur für einfache Kommentare/Erklärungen von Endbenutzer zu Endbenutzer bestimmt ist. Es ist nicht für maschineninterpretierbare Daten gedacht und wird nicht geparst werden. Im Falle semantischer Überschneidungen oder Widersprüche zu maschinenlesbaren Inhalten wird diesen der Vorzug gegenüber durch Menschen lesbaren gegeben. Allerdings können durch Menschen lesbare Felder für Ergänzungen zu maschinenlesbaren verwendet werden.}}|reminder}}


[[Category:GeneralDescription]]
[[Category:GeneralDescription]]
[[category:Common Concept]]
[[category:Common Concept]]

Revision as of 15:55, 6 May 2019

railML Identities

Very much railML elements require an id attribute of the W3C-Type xs:ID.

This has to be provided in order to enable references, that are very much used within the railML schemas.

On the other hand, software tools may refer to certain railML elements, that are not referred to within the railML file.

Semantics

The general railML description states the following semantics for this attribute.

  • id: XML-file-wide unique, machine-interpretable identity, required for later referencing that element internally. For a detailed explanation see Dev:identities.
    XML-Datei-weit eindeutige, maschineninterpretierbare Identität, die für die spätere interne Referenzierung dieses Elements erforderlich ist. Für eine detaillierte Erklärung siehe Dev:identities.

Constraints

The general railML description states the following contraints.

  • id: xs:ID, required
    a string, starting with a letter (a..zA..Z) or an underscore (_),
    followed by a non-colonized and non-spaced string consisting of letters, digits, points (.), dashes (-) or underscores (_)

Export of railML files

Software tools, which create railML files, are free to define id values according to the above mentioned constraints.

Recommendation

railML recommends using generic values, e.g.

<formation id="d2e717" name="TGV-ICE3">...

or serial numbers with letter prefixes, e.g.

<formation id="rsf0002" name="TGV-ICE3">...

or UUID's, e.g.

<formation id="f36014b1-055d-4171-91a4-2a32a3210f28" name="TGV-ICE3">...

.(Please note: a Nil UUID shall not be used; UUID's Version 4 is commonly used. Due to the limitations of the ID type by www.w3.org in railML® 2 the ID shall begin with a letter!)

Bad style

Sometimes exporting software tools create id values, that contain semantic data, like train numbers or vehicle family codes.

Only if this semantic information is repeated in separate attributes of the same element, the importing software is not required to parse this id value.

<formation id="fTGV-ICE3" name="TGV-ICE3">...

Please use some more generic coding style in order to not invite the importing software to parse the id values!

Wrong style

If the semantic information is not separated, the importing software has to parse the id value in order to use it.
<formation id="fTGV-ICE3">...

This coding style hinders interoperability!

Please use a generic coding style for the id value. Look for appropriate railML attributes in the element and put the semantics there. Otherwise use the xs:anyAttribute mechanism.

The use of this Wrong style prevents certification of the export interface.

Import of railML files

Recommendation

Software tools, which consume railML files, should take the id values only for referencing issues.

In case of valid railML files, no problems will occur.

Good style

In case of consuming "good or bad styled" id values the importing software provides routines for getting the semantics from better fitting attributes.

In case of consuming "wrong styled" id values the importing software is required to parse the attribute content for getting the semantics.

That way, the most robust import interface is assured.

Wrong style

The importing software expects to parse the id value with a special regular expression in order to get the coded semantics.

That way, "good styled" id values can't be imported!


The use of this Wrong style prevents certification of the import interface.

Differentiation from other indications

Many elements that come with an attribute id will also have the attributes code, name description.

  • code: Like id it is machine readable, but a code is designed for interoperability. An id is valid within a single file. A code can be valid e.g. within a network and has to be unique within the network.
  • name: A short, human readable Identifier. Uniqueness is not required.
  • description: Human readable text that gives details. Uniqueness is not required.
💡 Please be aware that this attribute is only intended to forward simple remarks/explanations from one end-user to another end-user. It is not to be used to contain computer-processable data, nor shall it be parsed by programmes in any way. In case of semantical overlaps or discrepancies to machine processable file contents, any machine processable contents have priority over possible human interpretable contents. However, the attribute may be used to transmit complementary details to machine processable parameters.

Bitte, berücksichtigen Sie, dass dieses Attribut nur für einfache Kommentare/Erklärungen von Endbenutzer zu Endbenutzer bestimmt ist. Es ist nicht für maschineninterpretierbare Daten gedacht und wird nicht geparst werden. Im Falle semantischer Überschneidungen oder Widersprüche zu maschinenlesbaren Inhalten wird diesen der Vorzug gegenüber durch Menschen lesbaren gegeben. Allerdings können durch Menschen lesbare Felder für Ergänzungen zu maschinenlesbaren verwendet werden.