Dev:changes/2.2: Difference between revisions

From railML 2 Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
(→‎Infrastructure subschema: adding change for trackNode geoCoord)
Line 10: Line 10:


== Infrastructure subschema ==
== Infrastructure subschema ==
=== {{IS:Doc|trackBegin}}/{{IS:Doc|geoCoord}} and {{IS:Doc|trackEnd}}/{{IS:Doc|geoCoord}} ===
{|
|Fact:
| The {{IS:Tag|geoCoord}} element has been added as child element of {{IS:Tag|trackBegin}} and {{IS:Tag|trackEnd}} element.
|-
| Reason:
| So far it was not possible to define the begin or the end of a track by their geographic coordinates.
|-
| Recommendation:
| Use the new {{IS:Tag|geoCoord}} element in {{IS:Tag|trackBegin}} and {{IS:Tag|trackEnd}}.
|-
| Related Trac Tickets:
| [http://trac.railml.org/ticket/135 #135]
|-
| Related SVN Commits:
| [http://trac.railml.org/changeset/433 [433]]
|-
| geoCoord sample:
|
<syntaxhighlight lang="xml">
<trackTopology>
  <trackBegin id="tr01_tb" pos="0">
    <geoCoord coord="50.350834 7.589025" epsgCode="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326" />
  </trackBegin>
  <trackEnd id="tr01_te" pos="61229">
    <geoCoord coord="49.968768 7.889734" epsgCode="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326" />
  </trackEnd>
</trackTopology>
</syntaxhighlight>
|}


=== {{IS:Doc|ocp}}/{{Attr|@abbrevation}} ===
=== {{IS:Doc|ocp}}/{{Attr|@abbrevation}} ===

Revision as of 19:41, 29 March 2017

railML schema changes between railML® 2.1 and railML® 2.2

This site is intended to collect the schema changes between railML® 2.1 and railML® 2.2 by topics, that influence the XML output. As it starts as a stub please refer to railML forum and railML's ticket system too.

For changes with other version upgrades see CO:changes.

Timetable subschema

Missinginformation.png In this article there is information missing with respect to the all the TT's changes in railML's version 2.2. Please help improving the railML® wiki by filling the gaps. Possibly, you will find further details on the discussion pageVasco Paul Kolmorgen (Diskussion) 18:29, 11. Feb. 2016 (CET)

Infrastructure subschema

trackBegin/geoCoord and trackEnd/geoCoord

Fact: The <geoCoord> element has been added as child element of <trackBegin> and <trackEnd> element.
Reason: So far it was not possible to define the begin or the end of a track by their geographic coordinates.
Recommendation: Use the new <geoCoord> element in <trackBegin> and <trackEnd>.
Related Trac Tickets: #135
Related SVN Commits: [433]
geoCoord sample:
<trackTopology>
  <trackBegin id="tr01_tb" pos="0">
    <geoCoord coord="50.350834 7.589025" epsgCode="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326" />
  </trackBegin>
  <trackEnd id="tr01_te" pos="61229">
    <geoCoord coord="49.968768 7.889734" epsgCode="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326" />
  </trackEnd>
</trackTopology>

ocp/@abbrevation

Fact: The abbrevation attribute in the <ocp> element is declared deprecated.
Reason: There are multiple different abbreviations for single operation or control points. They can't be defined with one attribute.
Recommendation: Use the new <tsi> and/or <designator> elements instead.
Related Trac Tickets: #112
Related SVN Commits: [335], [439]
Old sample (railML 2.1):
<ocp ... name="Passau Hbf." abbrevation="NPA"/>
New sample (railML 2.2):
<ocp ... name='Passau Hbf.' ...>
  <tsi country="80"/>
  <designator register='RL100' entry='NPA'/>
  <designator register='ENEE' entry='80-26506-6'/>
  <designator register='PLC' entry='DE18274'/>
  <designator register='IBNR' entry='8000298'/>
  <designator register='DB640' entry='Pa'/>
</ocp>

Missinginformation.png In this article there is information missing with respect to all the additonal IS's changes in railML's version 2.2. Please help improving the railML® wiki by filling the gaps. Possibly, you will find further details on the discussion pageVasco Paul Kolmorgen (Diskussion) 18:29, 11. Feb. 2016 (CET)

Rollingstock subschema

Missinginformation.png In this article there is information missing with respect to the RS's changes in railML's version 2.2. Please help improving the railML® wiki by filling the gaps. Possibly, you will find further details on the discussion pageVasco Paul Kolmorgen (Diskussion) 18:29, 11. Feb. 2016 (CET)

Common subschema

Missinginformation.png In this article there is information missing with respect to the CO's changes in railML's version 2.2. Please help improving the railML® wiki by filling the gaps. Possibly, you will find further details on the discussion pageVasco Paul Kolmorgen (Diskussion) 18:29, 11. Feb. 2016 (CET)